Validation of a Chromatographic Method for the Quantification of Furvina in 0.15% Dermofural Ointment

Authors

  • Oscar García Pulpeiro Empresa Laboratorio Farmacéutico Roberto Escudero, Equipo de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación. Cerro, La Habana, Cuba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-4631
  • María Caridad de la Concepción Rojas Empresa Laboratorio Farmacéutico Roberto Escudero, Equipo de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación. Cerro, La Habana, Cuba. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3495-9954
  • María Isabel Díaz Molina Universidad Central de Las Villas, Centro de Bioactivos Químicos, Unidad de Aseguramiento de la Calidad. Santa Clara, Villa Clara, Cuba. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-3131

Keywords:

high-performance liquid chromatography/method; HPLC/method; furvina; dermofural; validation

Abstract

Introduction: Furvina, developed by the Center for Bioactive Chemicals at Marta Abreu Central University, is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in 0.15% Dermofural, used to treat dermatological infections. Its reintroduction to the market requires ensuring quality and stability through a validated analytical method.

Objective: To validate a high-performance liquid chromatography method for quantifying furvina in 0.15% Dermofural.

Methods: The analytical procedure was based on liquid-liquid extraction of furvina with acetonitrile, followed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, using a mobile phase of acetonitrile:water (80:20, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min and detection at 375 nm. Certified material (>98% purity) was used. Validation followed Regulation 40-2014 of the State Center for the Control of Medicines, Equipment, and Medical Devices; the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Q2(R2) guideline; and statistical analysis using Statgraphics Centurion 19.

Results: The method demonstrated accuracy with a mean recovery of 99.25% (coefficient of variation = 1.20%), and a calculated t-test value (1.8757) lower than the tabulated value (2.1199). Precision was assessed for repeatability (mean = 99.39%, coefficient of variation = 0.28%) and intermediate precision using multifactorial ANOVA, with p-values > 0.05 and a 95% confidence level. Linearity showed a correlation coefficient (r = 0.9999), with confidence intervals for the slope (1.0002–1.0025) and intercept (-0.0217–0.0165) and theoretical values (1 and 0). Specificity confirmed the absence of interferences in quantification.

Conclusions: The validated method complies with regulatory standards for accuracy, precision, linearity, and specificity. Its consistency ensures applicability in quality control and stability studies.

Author Biography

María Caridad de la Concepción Rojas, Empresa Laboratorio Farmacéutico Roberto Escudero, Equipo de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación. Cerro, La Habana, Cuba.

Especialista en Investigación, Desarrollo e innovación

References

1. Caraballoso M, Calvo AM, de la Torre JB, Quintana A, Quiñones YA, Norman- O. Validación y cálculo de la incertidumbre del resultado de la técnica cromatográfica para determinar G-1 y MBr en lotes de furvina. Rev Cuba Quím. 2016 [acceso 28/06/2024];28(3):818-23. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2 224-54212016000 300007

2. Perez Z, Rodríguez Y, Rodriguez Z, Molina R, Medina R, Ancede E. Development of a new formulation for

onychomycosis treatment using furvina® as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on BioGeoSciences. Cham: Springer Int. Publishing; 2019 [acceso 28/06/2024]. p. 191-203. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/9dwtyf

3. Pérez Z, Rodríguez Z, Alvarez O, Medina R, Rodríguez Y. Development of a medicated nail lacquer for onychomycosis treatment. Afinidad. 2021 [acceso 3/09/ 2024];78(593). Disponible en: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/afinidad/article/view/389903

4. Centro Estatal para el Control de Medicamentos, Equipos y Dispositivos Médicos (CECMED). Regulación 16-2012. Directrices sobre buenas prácticas de fabricación de productos farmacéuticos. La Habana: CECMED; 2012 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://www.cecmed.cu/reglamentacion/aprobadas/resolucion-minsap-40

5. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 46–NF 41). 46 ed. Rockville, MD: USA Pharm Conv; 2023 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://www.m-pharmaguide.com/2024/09/us-pharmacopoeia-2023-usp-46-nf-41.html

6. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to modern liquid chromatography. 3rd ed. Nashville, TN: J Wiley & Sons; 2011 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/g3j8q

7. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. London: EMA; 2021 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/0cxgj

8. British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia 2024. London: The Stationery Office; 2024 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://www.pharmacopoeia.com/content/html/455

9. Empresa Laboratorio Farmacéutico Roberto Escudero. Método analítico para determinación de furvina en Dermofural 0,15% ungüento. PNO-INV 3 008. Ed. 01-23. Documento interno; 2023.

10. Empresa Laboratorio Farmacéutico Roberto Escudero. Protocolo de validación de la técnica para determinación de furvina en Dermofural 0,15% ungüento. PVT-Q-087. Ed. 01-22. Documento interno; 2022.

11. Centro Estatal para el Control de Medicamentos, Equipos y Dispositivos Médicos (CECMED). Resolución No. 40/2014. Regulación No. 37/2012. Anexo I: Buenas prácticas para laboratorios de control de medicamentos. Validación de métodos analíticos. Habana: CECMED; 2014 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible: https://n9.cl/uu4b1

12. International Council for Harmonization (ICH). Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2022 [acceso 28/06/2024] Disponible en: https://n9.cl/2ycfc

13. Bedson P, Duguid TJ. Practical statistics for the analytical scientist: a bench guide. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2021 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/70ax6v

14. Cooksey RW. Illustrating statistical procedures: finding meaning in quantitative data. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7

15. Guthrie WF. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST Handbook 151). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18434/M32189

16. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). ICH topic Q1A(R2): stability testing of new drug substances and products. London: European Medicines Agency; 2003 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/2ycfc

17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Analytical procedures and methods validation for drugs and biologics – Guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2015 [acceso 28/06/2024]. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/8vjfty

18. Arshad M, Mahato K, Rajendrakumar K, Nilesh D, Patel K. Sample preparation and

extraction techniques for evaluation of semisolid pharmaceutical formulations: a review. Asian J Pharm Res Health Care. 2023;15(2):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_116_22.

Published

2026-10-18

How to Cite

1.
García Pulpeiro O, de la Concepción Rojas MC, Díaz Molina MI. Validation of a Chromatographic Method for the Quantification of Furvina in 0.15% Dermofural Ointment. Rev Cubana Farm [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 18 [cited 2026 Oct. 18];59. Available from: https://revfarmacia.sld.cu/index.php/far/article/view/1193

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS DE REVISIÓN